We represent clients from all U.S. and International locations regarding Federal Tax and California Issues.
If you have visited our tax blog, you have likely heard us discussing a federal law known as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA. For those who may be unfamiliar with the legislation, here is a brief summary: under FATCA, U.S. citizens (including residents plus certain non-residents) must report offshore assets exceeding $50,000 by filing Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets). As a backup to this self-reporting requirement – which many taxpayers, whether deliberately or inadvertently, fail to comply with – FATCA also requires foreign financial institutions (FFIs), such as non-U.S. banks and mutual funds, to report information about U.S. customers to the IRS. It appears that, despite facing heavy fines, many FFIs were failing to comply, spurring the IRS’ June announcement of new enforcement programs targeting FFIs. However, while FFIs may be the primary target of the campaign, taxpayers are also likely to suffer as more foreign banks begin turning over information to avoid fines. If you have unreported offshore accounts, now is the time to discuss your voluntary disclosure options with an international tax attorney.
Speaking on a tax panel hosted at New York University in June 2019, Kimberly Schoenbacher, who is the current Director of Field Operations for the LB&I Foreign Payments Practice, announced that the Internal Revenue Service is launching a new compliance campaign targeting FFIs that have failed to report U.S. customers. In other words, the campaign is focused on FFIs that have failed to file Form 8966 (FATCA Report), which is the form used to identify foreign account holders under FATCA. This form requires FFIs to report information including, but not limited to, the following:
If the IRS determines that an FFI has failed to file Forms 8966 where appropriate, two things will happen:
In many cases, FFIs are foreign banks where U.S. customers have checking accounts or savings accounts – for instance, Swiss or Israeli banks. However, banks are not the only entities that meet the IRS’ definition of an FFI. Other entities that are considered FFIs, and may, therefore, be affected by the new campaign, include:
On the surface, it is FFIs which face the greatest danger from this new campaign. However, it may be individual taxpayers who are truly at risk. As the IRS “turns up the heat” on noncompliant FFIs, many will report their customers in order to avoid the 30% withholding tax. If you have received a FATCA letter from your bank, or if you are concerned about past failures to report offshore bank accounts, it is in your best interests to consult with a FATCA attorney now – before your disclosure options begin to dwindle. Noncompliant taxpayers risk heavy fines, and even criminal FATCA prosecution, unless they act swiftly and strategically.
To arrange a reduced-rate consultation with the experienced FATCA tax lawyers at the Tax Law Office of David W. Klasing, contact us online today, or call our main office in Irvine at (800) 681-1295. Our tax firm has distinguished itself in the area of FATCA compliance, making our practice ideally suited to handling complex offshore disclosure issues.
Also, we’ve expanded our offices! In addition to our offices in Irvine and Los Angeles, the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing now have offices San Bernardino, Santa Barbara, Panorama City, Oxnard, San Diego, Bakersfield, San Jose, San Francisco, Oakland and Sacramento.
Note: If you have concerns about the privacy of our initial or subsequent communication and are unable to easily travel to our Irvine / Orange County Main Office, consider scheduling a GoToMeeting to safely and securely establish an initial or maintain an existing attorney client relationship. With end-to-end encryption, strong passwords and top-rated reliability, no one is messing with your meeting. To schedule a reduced rate initial consultation via GoToMeeting follow this link. Call our office and request a GoToMeeting if you are an existing client. We are generally happy to travel to any of our appointment only satellite offices for a subsequent meeting in appropriate circumstances once a relationship is established via a signed engagement letter and the payment of an initial retainer or where enough retainer is available where a current client to cover the reasonable travel time and time required for the meeting.
Will it cost me more to hire the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing, who’s main office and the vast majority of the firm’s staff is located in Irvine California, but an appointment only Satellite office is close to my location, as opposed to a local company? Absolutely not! See our policies that address this issue here: