NJ Accountant Pleads Guilty to Tax Fraud After Concealing Over $3M from IRS

tax evasion indictment
Wisconsin Dentist Indicted on Tax Evasion Charges
August 25, 2019
Earenest Grayson Jr. - Zealcon Corporation - Oklahoma Tax Fraud
Software Business Owner Pleads Guilty to Payroll Tax Crimes
August 26, 2019

NJ Accountant Pleads Guilty to Tax Fraud After Concealing Over $3M from IRS

criminal tax evasion

According to a Department of Justice (DOJ) press release, defendant Louis Picardo, 64, an accountant and former tax collector for the city of Hoboken, pleaded guilty in June to tax evasion in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Picardo admitted to concealing close to $4 million of income from the IRS over a period of several years, thereby failing to pay over $914,000 in federal income tax liabilities. According to the criminal information (charging document) against Picardo, who belonged to several property management companies in addition to his accounting firm, the defendant “did willfully attempt to evade and defeat a substantial part of the personal income tax due and owing… by preparing and causing to be prepared, and by signing and causing to be signed, and by causing to be filed with the IRS false and fraudulent” tax returns, including returns for the years 2012 through 2015. According to anonymous sources, investigators turned their attention to Picardo during an investigation into his client, local politician Frank Raia, who is currently awaiting trial for vote-by-mail fraud – something which should ring alarm bells for any tax preparer or personal accountant whose clients may have criminal tax exposure.

See our Criminal Tax Law Q and A Library

 

Former Tax Collector, Accountant Admits to Felony Tax Evasion

The information against Picardo alleged that the defendant repeatedly and deliberately underreported his income on federal tax returns, resulting in a significant underpayment of taxes, for tax years 2012 through 2015. The information provided the following dates and amounts, asserting that Picardo committed tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S. Code § 7201 (pertaining to attempts to evade or defeat tax):

  • Picardo filed his 2012 tax return in December 2014, failing to report approximately $569,761 in income. This caused a tax loss of approximately $88,860.
  • Picardo’s return for tax year 2013 underreported approximately $568,601 in income, resulting in a tax loss of $86,850.
  • The personal income tax return Picardo filed for tax year 2014 underreported his income by more than $1.4 million (approximately $1,432,890), over twice the amount concealed in previous years. The resulting tax loss to the U.S. government was approximately $368,795 – more than three times the prior losses caused by Picardo’s offenses.
  • Picardo’s 2015 tax return again concealed over $1 million, on this occasion underreporting income by approximately $1,154,601. The resulting tax loss was calculated to be $370,403.

In total, Picardo concealed taxable income amounting to $3,725,853, producing a total tax loss of $914,908 over a period of four tax years.

Picardo is currently scheduled to be sentenced in September 2019. At sentencing, he will face a prison term of up to five years, which is the statutory maximum established by 26 U.S. Code § 7201. Picardo also faces fines of up to $250,000, in addition to IRS restitution and the possibility of supervised release, which is similar to probation.

 

Have Unreported Income? Get Tax Help from an Experienced IRS Tax Defense Attorney

The underreporting of income is a telltale “red flag” for the IRS’ revenue agents. In fact, underreported income is listed among the many “indicators of fraud” provided by the Internal Revenue Service in IRM 25.1.2 (Recognizing and Developing Fraud), which lists the failure to “report or explain substantial amounts of income” as a badge of tax fraud under Section 25.1.2.3. If you have failed to report all of your taxable income, whether on your most recent tax return or on returns from tax years past, the safest course of action is to consult with an experienced attorney-CPA for personalized guidance on how to best resolve the issue.

At the Tax Law Office of David W. Klasing, we are IRS examination and tax evasion defense lawyers with over 20 years of experience helping taxpayers prepare for and navigate tax audits, achieve tax compliance, and avoid or mitigate civil and criminal fraud penalties. To discuss your tax question confidentially with an IRS tax lawyer in California, call our law offices at (800) 681-1295, or contact the Tax Law Office of David W. Klasing online to schedule a reduced-rate consultation.

Also, we’ve expanded our offices! In addition to our offices in Irvine and Los Angeles, the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing now have offices San BernardinoSanta BarbaraPanorama CityOxnardSan DiegoBakersfieldSan Jose, San FranciscoOakland and Sacramento.

Note: If you have concerns about the privacy of our initial or subsequent communication and are unable to easily travel to our Irvine / Orange County Main Office, consider scheduling a GoToMeeting to safely and securely establish an initial or maintain an existing attorney client relationship.  With end-to-end encryption, strong passwords and top-rated reliability, no one is messing with your meeting. To schedule a reduced rate initial consultation via GoToMeeting follow this link.   Call our office and request a GoToMeeting if you are an existing client. We are generally happy to travel to any of our appointment only satellite offices for a subsequent meeting in appropriate circumstances once a relationship is established via a signed engagement letter and the payment of an initial retainer or where enough retainer is available where a current client to cover the reasonable travel time and time required for the meeting.

Will it cost me more to hire the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing, who’s main office and the vast majority of the firm’s staff is located in Irvine California, but an appointment only Satellite office is close to my location, as opposed to a local company?  Absolutely not!  See our policies that address this issue here:

See our Audit Representation Q and A Library

See our 2011 OVDI Q and A Library

See our FBAR Compliance and Disclosure Q and A Library

See our Foreign Audit Q and A Library